In that form, the singular factor matches with the verb causes Your sentence mixes the plural rooms with the singular factor, making it hard for you to figure out which form the verb cause (s) should take (this isn’t necessarily ungrammatical, but sometimes this can make a sentence. I dont understand when to use the cause and the causes I am writing this book review, and really need some help with this The sentence im struggling with is in both
What more idiomatic in the following context, causes of or causes for I want to put a title in a work Causes of/ for this problem now, i know that i can put simply Causes and no more neede. There is disagreement as to the causes of the fire I remained uncertain as to the value of his suggestions
As your link says, to cause to be is a definition of the word make As such, the phrase and the word can be fairly interchangeable when used that way The jalapenos caused my salsa to be too spicy. the jalapenos made my salsa too spicy. chlorine makes my hair dry. chlorine causes my hair to be (or to become) dry. i can't think of a circumstance where to cause to be would be. In the grammar test below, why option 3 is not correct 1)is there perhaps cause ( Here i've formed a phrase organic former usually use natural pesticides and fertilizers instead using chemical pesticide which may causes economic damage to agricultural productivity
for respective phrase from a passage organic farmers use natural pesticides and fertilizers I've used which may causes to form the phrase A situation in which one thing causes a series of other things to happen so you could word your sentence like this A mismatch has a ripple effect Yet another phrase you might use is chain. What does cause coral bleaching
So why make not cause As robusto says in the above comment, make just sounds less forceful and somewhat nicer However you could use either, depending on the context this drug makes me feel better (because i want to feel better)
WATCH
