In a method of foo, i want to get the class instance of type t, but i just can't call t.class What is the preferred way to get around it using t.class? What's the best way to call a generic method when the type parameter isn't known at compile time, but instead is obtained dynamically at runtime You can certainly define generic delegates, after all, that's exactly what func and action are They are treated as generic definitions, just like generic interfaces and classes are However, you cannot use generic definitions in method signatures, only parameterized generic types
Quite simply you cannot do what you are trying to achieve with a delegate alone. The generic parameter type will be the same for all methods, so i would like it at the class level I know i could make a generic version and then inherit from it for the int version, but i was just hoping to get it all in one.but i didn't know of any way to do that. Why do we observe this weird behaviour What keeps us from comparing the values of generic types which are known to be icomparable Doesn't it somehow defeat the entire purpose of generic constraints
Is there a clean method of mocking a class with generic parameters Say i have to mock a class foo<t> Which i need to pass into a method that expects a foo<bar> I can do the following Because under the hood, the compiler will go away and create a new type (sometimes called a closed generic type) for each different usage of the open generic type
WATCH
