The supreme court’s questioning of the use of a 1977 emergency law to impose tariffs on scores of countries raised doubt about the centerpiece of the president’s economic agenda. President trump's claim of unilateral power to impose tariffs across the globe hit a wall of skepticism at the supreme court on wednesday Over the course of an argument that lasted almost three. On august 29, the federal circuit ruled that the majority of the trump administration’s tariffs are illegal Specifically, it concluded that “ieepa’s grant of presidential authority to ‘regulate’ imports does not authorize the tariffs imposed by the executive orders.” The supreme court announced tuesday it will take up the issue of whether president donald trump’s “liberation day” tariffs are legal—and the justices’ decision could be hugely.
The supreme court considering trump's tariffs marks the first major test of his agressive assertion of presidential powers before the high court. The supreme court is now weighing whether president trump’s tariffs, which hinge on a specified economic emergency power, can remain intact It leaves one of his biggest policy initiatives. The supreme court appeared deeply concerned wednesday with president donald trump’s reliance on a vague federal law to impose global tariffs, with several members of the court’s conservative. On september 9, the supreme court granted the trump administration’s request to consider on an expedited basis its appeal of a lower court ruling that invalidated most tariffs imposed under the international emergency economic powers act (ieepa).
WATCH
