Tag shows text as italics, whereas <strong> Is this the only difference? Em gives the ability to control an area of a design As in, scale the type in that specific area relatively Rem gives the ability to scale type across the entire page easily. Changes developed by the ama and adopted by cms to simplify e/m documentation have made these tasks more relevant, says physician survey.
Strong y em, en cambio, marcan una diferencia en la fuerza o énfasis que se quiere dar a una palabra o frase sobre el texto completo En un navegador tradicional la diferencia no se percibe, ya que las etiquetas strong y em se estilizan como b e i respectivamente. Em has the purpose of giving em phasis to the content However, emphasis is semantic while italics is presentation I was deprecated in favour of em to make html a truly semantic markup. For a long time, old html (like <i>) is used for layout display
You may find some useful information about html 5 here and an interesting discussion here. It may be used for vertical or horizontal measurement Here are the salient points. Use the e/m calculator from the experts at codify I heard you should define sizes and distances in your stylesheet with em instead of in pixels So the question is why should i use em instead of px when defining styles in css
Is there a good exam.
WATCH
