Earlier this year, a lawyer filed a motion in a texas bankruptcy court that cited a 1985 case called brasher. Ai hallucination cases this database tracks legal decisions 1 i.e., all documents where the use of ai, whether established or merely alleged, is addressed in more than a passing reference by the court or tribunal. Some of the filings include fake quotes from real cases, or cite real cases that are irrelevant to their arguments The legal vigilantes uncover them by finding judges’ opinions scolding lawyers. New database tracks 156+ instances of lawyers citing fake cases from artificial intelligence ai in court filings Courts escalate sanctions to uphold rule 11 obligat
When chatbots make up the law Judges crack down on ai slop ai tools keep minting fake citations, and courts are handing out fines and public rebukes Verify every source, disclose use, and run a hard citation audit. Hilarious in the kitchen, disastrous in court Invented stats or cases that sound real but aren’t Ai loves to loop the same idea over and over
After new york attorneys generated headlines two years ago for citing fake cases, the aba released guidance on ai use, and the technology has been a featured topic at prominent legal conferences But the fake citations keep coming A texas court this month imposed a $2,500 sanction against an attorney who filed a brief citing multiple.
WATCH
